Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

This brief was prepared by Administrator and is available in category
Short selling
16 December 2013

Amir Khwaja: 2013, the year the swap market changed


As 2013 draws to a close, Khwaja looks at the US Dodd-Frank Act reforms in 2013 and makes a few projections for 2014.

On December 10th, we had the adoption of the Volcker rule, a key provision of the Dodd-Frank, designed to separate and limit proprietary trading from client trading. The media has been full of stories of the impact of this on the earnings of Swap dealers, with mixed views on whether firms have already moved out of these activities by spinning out or closing businesses or are yet to feel the impact.

In the US, the new market structure is largely complete, battle-lines have been drawn and we will soon see which firms gain and which firms lose. In many ways the baton of reform will pass from the US to Europe and Asia.

The European EMIR and MiFD Directives will come into force with the start of mandatory reporting in February 2014 and subsequent dates for mandatory clearing and trading on Organised Trading Facilities (OTFs).

Further afield, we see Trade Repositories and Clearing Houses, blooming all over Asia, with Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia, either already live or rolling ahead with implementation plans.

Of more importance than 2014, is the market structure not in 2014, but in 2018. One key characteristic is whether the swaps market will be horizontally integrated or vertically integrated like the futures markets. Despite the regulatory framework of open and competitive markets, so a product can be traded on one venue and then cleared on another, we now see in Futures a few large firms that are vertically integrated and national champions. CME, Eurex, ICE each trade and clear specific products in which they have all the liquidity.

Despite their privileged position, large profits and market capitalisation (CME $25 billion, ICE $23 billion), we do not see the same sort of press coverage as we get about Investment Banks and their out-size profits ($44 billion is an oft-quoted number).

While it is true that regulators did not find cause to implement significant reforms for Futures and Exchanges would say they are capable of efficiently processing massive volume, we cannot afford to be complacent.

Full article



© Clarus Financial Technology


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment