Insurance Europe welcomed the “good level” of transparency being introduced by IORP II, but its head of macroeconomics, Nicolas Jeanmart, was critical of the new arrangement allowing cross-border occupational pension funds to be underfunded when the same was not allowed for insurers providing pension payments.
“The trialogue agreement is concerning because it does not ensure a consistent regulatory response to cases of under-funding of IORPs’ cross-border activities, entailing a risk of regulatory arbitrage. It is therefore of vital importance that member states make the right decisions when implementing the directive to protect EU citizens’ occupational pensions.”
The insurance industry has often called for a level playing field between insurance products and occupational pension providers, pushing for the introduction of capital requirements and for cross-border funds to be fully funded at all times.
Its demands were reflected in a European Commission white paper on pensions in 2012, and elements of it were reflected in the European executive’s first draft of IORP II. However, during trialogue negotiations among the European Parliament, member states and the Commission, which concluded last month, a compromise was agreed allowing cross-border IORPs to “immediately draw up appropriate measures” to protect members in the event of underfunding, rather than force them to address deficits straight-away.
Full article (IPE subscription required)
© IPE International Publishers Ltd.
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
over these icons for more information
No Comments for this Article