Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

10 July 2013

EBF(欧州銀行協会)、MiFID II(第二次金融商品市場指令)/MiFIR(金融商品市場規則)の三者協議に向け、組織化された取引施設(OTF)運営者による自己勘定での対応を認めること、流動性や価格形成機能を阻害しない透明性要件とすることなどを要請


Default: Change to:


The EBF has taken a great interest in the MiFID review (MiFID II) and has engaged with policymakers at all stages of the co-legislative procedure.


European Banks favour capital markets that function properly and efficiently in order to serve the real economy. MiFID II will play a key role in this respect.

Key Points:

  • The EBF however fears that some of the MiFID II provisions could negatively impact European Capital markets and encourages the co-legislators to preserve quality of legislation over speed.
  • The EBF believes that market transparency underpins trust between all market participants. However, waivers to this principle should continue to be allowed to prevent unwanted impacts on the price formation process and on liquidity. Therefore, the EBF calls on the co-legislators to guarantee appropriate pre-trade transparency and post-trade transparency calibration tools for equities and non-equities in the level 1 text which could be further developed in level 2.
  • The use of proprietary capital as a tool for facilitating client orders is often key in liquidity provision for certain categories of instruments. Most EBF members therefore believe that the OTF operator should not be prohibited from trading against proprietary capital as a service to clients.
  • The EBF believes that it is important to enable clients to choose a less costly advice on the basis of proper disclosure of inducements. In this respect, most of EBF members supports the European Parliament’s approach where enhanced transparency is introduced.
  • The EBF strongly encourages the co-legislators to give ESMA sufficient time to produce thorough impact assessments and engage in adequate public consultation while ESMA is preparing delegated or implementing acts and the technical standards.
  • Finally, it is also vital to allow enough time between the finalisation of all the rules and the implementation date so that market participants and market infrastructures can make and safely test what may need to be significant system changes.

Full paper



© EBF


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment