There have been both market and official sector initiatives to develop ‘taxonomies’ (classification systems) in an effort to provide clear guidance on which activities, assets and/or projects qualify for sustainable finance, and more widely in some cases as sustainable for regulatory or prudential purposes.
Progress on the development of the EU
Taxonomy in particular has accelerated the discussion about taxonomies
all over the world.
ICMA’s new publication Overview and recommendations for sustainable finance taxonomies
compares the main features and methodologies of official taxonomies
from the EU, China and other national authorities as well as influential
market-based systems including the Green Bond Principles’ project
categories.
Nicholas Pfaff, ICMA’s Head of Sustainable Finance
said: ‘We hope that this paper will help market participants and service
providers better understand and use existing taxonomies, and will
provide especially the official sector with proposed success criteria to
benchmark current and future taxonomy initiatives. We emphasise that
taxonomies should be designed to work together with complementary
approaches in the market and need to be transition-enabled’.
The key success criteria proposed by the paper recommend that taxonomies should be:
- Targeted in their purpose and objectives.
- Additional in relation to existing international frameworks.
- Usable by the market for all intended purposes.
- Open and compatible with complementary approaches and initiatives.
- Transition-enabled incorporating trajectories and pathways.
ICMA
© ICMA
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article