House of Lords' EU Internal Market Sub-Committee: Opportunity for a more effective competition regime post-Brexit

02 February 2018

The EU Internal Market Sub-Committee publishes its report on the implications of Brexit for competition matters encompassing: anticompetitive conduct or agreements (antitrust), merger control, and State aid.

Key Findings

Antitrust and merger control

• While there should continue to be consistency between the UK and EU's approach to competition matters, the UK will be free to take a more innovative and responsive approach to tackling global competition enforcement challenges, such as fast-moving digital markets and dominant online platforms.
• It will be in the interests of UK and EU competition authorities to continue to cooperate post-Brexit. A formal cooperation agreement should be negotiated covering investigations and enforcement actions.

State aid

• After Brexit, a UK-wide domestic State aid framework will be needed in order to meet WTO obligations and avoid intra-UK subsidy races. It will be essential for the Government to involve and secure the support of the devolved administrations in developing this framework.

Transition

•  Transitional arrangements will be necessary to clarify jurisdiction in cases which are ‘live’ at the point of Brexit, as well as future cases relating to conduct which occurred while the UK was still a member of the EU. The terms of the transition period should be agreed in the first quarter of 2018 to ensure that businesses are not faced with the complexity and cost of adapting to Brexit twice.

Future policy

• In developing the UK's future competition regime, there is an opportunity to design a more inclusive system that better reflects domestic needs and priorities. The Government should launch a consultative process - involving all relevant stakeholders - to inform its decisions in this regard, and any related legislation.

Report Brexit: competition and State aid

© House of Lords