|
The European Banking Authority (EBA) today published the results of its 2023 EU-wide stress test, which involved 70 banks from 16 EU and EEA countries, covering 75% of the EU banking sector assets. This stress test allows supervisors to assess the resilience of EU banks over a three-year horizon under both a baseline and an adverse scenario. The adverse scenario is characterised by severe negative shocks to economic growth, higher unemployment combined with higher interest rates and credit spreads. In terms of GDP decline, the 2023 adverse scenario is the most severe used in the EU wide stress up to now. The individual bank results promote market discipline and are used as part of the EU supervisory decision-making process.
This year’s stress test includes some important enhancements compared to past stress test exercises. These enhancements include an increased sample with 20 more banks, the introduction of top-down elements for net fees and commission income (NFCI), and a detailed analysis on banks’ sectoral exposures.
|
CET1 capital ratio |
Leverage ratio |
|||||
|
End 2022 |
Baseline 2025 |
Adverse 2025 |
Delta baseline 2025-2022 |
Delta adverse 2025-2022 |
End 2022 |
Adverse 2025 |
Fully loaded |
15.0% |
16.3% |
10.4% |
+136 bps |
-459 bps |
5.4% |
4.3% |
Note: Bank projections are based on the accounting regime applicable as of 31 December 2022. IFRS 17 on insurance contracts which entered into force on 1 January 2023 was not considered. To ensure sufficient transparency banks were asked to provide their fully loaded CET1 capital ratio as of 1st January 2023 applying IFRS 17 in addition to their projections in certain cases.
The EBA published the granular bank results, including detailed information at the starting and end point of the exercise, under both the baseline and the adverse scenarios.
The EBA EU-wide stress test does not consider a pre-defined pass/fail threshold. It is, however, an important input for the Pillar 2 assessment of banks by their supervisors. The results of the stress test will assist Competent Authorities in assessing banks’ ability to meet applicable prudential requirements under the stress scenario and form a solid ground for discussion between the supervisor and the individual banks on their capital and distribution plans, in the context of the normal supervisory cycle.