Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

26 February 2014

Fitch: Potential EU money fund ABCP restrictions still not clear


Default: Change to:


The decision by the ECON Committee to postpone agreement on draft rules to regulate money market funds leaves the scope of possible investment restrictions on asset-backed commercial paper unclear, Fitch Ratings says.


These restrictions may prompt significant asset reallocation for some MMFs, depending on the scope of the regulation. Euro- and sterling-denominated constant net asset value MMFs in Europe held €9.3 billion of ABCP at end 2013, according to iMoneyNet, and certain MMFs have up to 30 per cent of their investments in ABCP.

Draft rules proposed by the European Commission would prevent MMFs investing in ABCP backed by assets other than trade receivables. In practice, this would prevent MMFs investing in almost all ABCP conduits. However, it is not certain whether the restriction is limited to conduits that hold assets other than trade receivables, or that are permitted to hold such assets, even if they do not. In addition, an MMF's aggregate securitisation exposure, which includes ABCP, would be restricted to 10 per cent of assets.

Amendments suggested late last year by some MEPs would make the draft rules less restrictive and grant more power ESMA to define eligible ABCP for MMFs based on the liquidity and credit quality of the ABCP collateral pool. Some proposed amendments would allow MMFs to hold "securitisations where the underlying assets are associated with supporting the working capital of manufacturers and the sales of real economy goods and services". In addition to trade receivables, this definition of securitisation would include auto and equipment loans and leases, SME loans, and consumer loans, subject to credit quality, liquidity and maturity criteria.

Another potential side effect of the proposed amendments is incentivising MMFs to invest in unsecured bank commercial paper rather than fully-supported ABCP. In a fully-supported conduit, the sponsor protects the conduit against default risk of the underlying assets, so that there is implicit recourse to both the sponsor and the underlying assets. The new restrictions may cause MMFs to reallocate investment away from fully supported conduits to unsecured bank commercial paper that only provides recourse to the bank.

The ECON Committee has a rescheduled vote to finalise draft rules on 10 March.

Full press release



© Fitch, Inc.


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment