In July 2007 the
IFRIC issued an Interpretation,
IFRIC 14
IAS 19—The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction. Since the release of the Interpretation the
IFRIC has observed several press articles and statements by market commentators providing an inaccurate assessment of the effect of
IFRIC 14. This document addresses the key issues that have been raised.
Whether and how IFRIC 14 applies to a particular entity will depend on the exact terms of the pension plan and the regulatory requirements in the relevant jurisdiction, and should be determined by reference to IFRIC 14 itself.
The Interpretation does not change the rules on funding. It also does not affect an entity's ability to get a refund.
An additional liability is recognised only if two conditions exist at the same time:
If the entity has a statutory or contractual obligation to pay additional amounts to the plan and
If the entity’s ability to recover those amounts in the future by refund or otherwise is restricted.
In that case, the recognition of an additional liability reflects the economic reality.
The Interpretation clarifies when a surplus in a pension plan can be recognised
IFRIC 14 provides a clearer interpretation of the availability of a surplus than the original standard, IAS 19 Employee Benefits.
The Interpretation ensures that the accounting for surpluses is consistent and transparent
The Interpretation will ensure that any economic consequences of making contributions required by legislation or the terms of the plan will be treated in a transparent and consistent manner by all entities.
IASB document
© IASB - International Accounting Standards Board
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article