Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

09 April 2014

EIOPA(欧州保険年金機構)、保険分野における国際的な資本基準の導入が規制アービトラージを防止し、金融安定性を向上させると主張


Default: Change to:


In an article for the Eurofi Newsletter, Gabriel Bernardino, Chairman of EIOPA, argues that the introduction of global capital standards in the insurance field should help prevent regulatory arbitrage, increase financial stability and strengthen international supervisory coordination.


The introduction of global capital standards in the insurance field should help prevent regulatory arbitrage, increase financial stability, guarantee a level playing field and strengthen international supervisory coordination, for the benefit of the economy at large, including financial institutions and consumers.

In this context, the development of a Basic Capital Requirement (BCR) has the main objective of creating a first layer of comparability at global level, allowing its use as a basis for the calculation of Higher Loss Absorbency (HLA) for the Global Systemically Important Insurers (G-SIIs).

The BCR should be kept simple and straightforward in its presentation, therefore relying on a factor-based approach. However, it is inappropriate to use a single factor solution, similar to the banking sector Leverage Ratio. Insurance balance sheets are far more complex than banking ones.

As for the development of the Insurance Capital Standard (ICS), EIOPA would need an evolutionary approach. The basic sound principles of Solvency II should be applied internationally. This means that the international capital standards should incorporate the fundamental principles underlying Solvency II: a total balance sheet approach, clear and transparent target criteria for calibration of capital requirements, explicit recognition of risk diversification and consideration in capital requirement of all the material risks to which the group is exposed.

But, that does not mean that the ICS need to be as granular as Solvency II. A step-by-step approach that will allow for the use of calculations with different levels of sophistication and progressively create more commonality at the level of calibration could be envisaged.

In this context, Solvency II could be viewed as a practical implementation of the ICS, but going forward it is needed to be opened to make adjustments to it if that is needed. Groups should be subject to only one capital regime.

Full article



© EIOPA


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment