In the motion, ECON:
calls on the EU Commission to prioritise recovery and resolution of central counterparties (CCPs) and those central securities depositories (CSDs) which are exposed to credit risk;
expresses its belief that resolution plans for cross-border firms should be based on the presumption of cooperation between authorities in different jurisdictions (an assumption that all regulators may not share; and
calls on the EU Commission to ensure that a clearing member’s default fund is exhausted before any losses from a defaulting clearing member can be passed on to a client of the clearing member.
However of most interest, according to this blog, is the request that the EU Commission ensure that CCPs “act in the general public interest”. Unfortunately, ECON does not expand on what it would actually mean in practice or how such a requirement would be enforced. This statement is as laudable as it is vague and it is probably this latter aspect which will result in it being quietly buried. Nonetheless, this is probably just one to log somewhere in the memory bank should there ever be a chance that it sees the light of day at some point in the future.
Swinburne report, 22.10.13
© Regulatory Reform WordPress.com
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
over these icons for more information
No Comments for this Article