Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

04 October 2013

Economist: Close scrutiny of Europe's banks may turn up unexpected shortfalls


The ECB finds itself at odds with national banking supervisors over the extent of its powers and the rigour with which it will undertake its first big task, the AQR.

The ECB is emphasising that the AQR is not a stress test, which would simulate the effect of various economic scenarios on banks’ balance-sheets. Instead it is doing a preliminary examination to ensure that it understands what is on banks’ books in the first place. National regulators fret that they will be embarrassed by what it finds. This has prompted some to push back hard to limit the scope of the ECB’s inquiries.

Surprisingly, this resistance is not coming from countries on Europe’s periphery such as Spain, which have much to gain from the imprimatur of ECB supervision. Rather it is coming from core countries such as France and, to a lesser extent, Germany, where seemingly well-capitalised banks may come out of the asset review looking threadbare.

One issue is the “risk-weighting” of assets, a process by which banks adjust the size of their capital buffer to account for the riskiness of their lending. The ECB is likely to push for greater consistency in risk-weighting, which could force banks in France, Germany and elsewhere to raise capital.

Full article



© The Economist


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment