The FSB published a progress report on reducing reliance on, and strengthening the oversight of, credit rating agencies. The progress report is accompanied by the interim peer review report on national implementation of the FSB Principles for Reducing Reliance on Credit Rating Agency Ratings.
The progress report includes a summary of the main findings and recommendations of the peer review, describes ongoing work by standard-setting bodies to reduce references to CRA ratings in international standards, and provides an update on work by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) to improve transparency and competition among CRAs.
The main points of the progress report are as follows:
Authorities need to accelerate work to end the mechanistic reliance of regulatory regimes and of market participants on external ratings, which can lead to herd behaviour and cliff effects in market prices when downgrades occur.
The FSB is taking forward its roadmap to reduce reliance on CRA ratings through a peer review of national authorities’ actions to reduce reliance. The review aims to accelerate progress and assist national authorities in fulfilling their commitments under the roadmap.
The interim peer review notes that jurisdictions have faced different starting positions from which to make reforms. The US has moved the furthest in removing hard-wiring of ratings, and the EU has also made significant progress. Progress in most other jurisdictions has been slower.
Among existing international standards, the greatest use of CRA ratings is in the Basel framework. The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision has made proposals to reduce reliance in its securitisation framework and by mid-2014 will make proposals on reducing reliance within its standardised approach for capital requirements. The challenge is to identify credible alternative standards of creditworthiness.
Market participants need to improve their own capacity to make their own credit assessments in order that they can safely reduce their reliance on CRA ratings. This too presents challenges and will take time.
FSB members should disclose action plans, as agreed under the roadmap, that identify and prioritise further areas for changes in laws and regulations. These action plans will be used in the second stage of the peer review to share lessons on the steps that can be taken by authorities to reduce references to CRA ratings in legislation and regulation and to promote strengthened credit assessment capabilities.
IOSCO sees enhanced transparency as playing an important role in market competition and may enhance its transparency standards for CRAs as part of its ongoing revision of its CRA Code of Conduct. The FSB will continue to monitor whether further work is needed in this area beyond the revision of the Code.
The interim peer review report includes a structured stock-taking of references to CRA ratings in national authorities’ laws and regulations and of actions taken and underway to reduce those references. A few FSB jurisdictions have not yet completed a stock-taking, and the peer review recommends that they do so by end-September 2013.
While recognising the progress made in implementing the Principles, the peer review has identified several areas where accelerated progress is needed, including that, FSB jurisdictions should:
provide incentives to financial institutions to develop their own independent credit assessment processes;
encourage or continue to enhance disclosures on financial institutions’ internal credit risk assessment practices (drawing on guidance from standard-setting bodies where available).
The peer review has also identified a number of challenges that need to be addressed in order to make further progress in implementing the Principles. These include reducing undue reliance on CRA ratings in international standards as well as in private contracts or private sector investment decisions; identifying suitable alternative standards of creditworthiness; and addressing constraints in the development of internal risk assessment systems, particularly for smaller firms. The second stage of the peer review will analyse these challenges in more detail. The FSB intends to issue the final peer review report in early 2014.
© Financial Stability Board
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
over these icons for more information
No Comments for this Article