Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

This brief was prepared by Administrator and is available in category
Brexit and the City
12 May 2013

Simon Nixon: Time for Cameron to explain EU stance


Thanks to the intervention of a number of influential figures in Cameron's Conservative party and the determination of many of its backbenchers to get his referendum commitment enshrined in law, a UK exit from the EU is firmly back on the political agenda, writes Nixon in his WSJ column.

Until recently, it was homegrown regulation that was causing the greatest anxiety in the UK financial community. True, there is now real concern in the City that a proposal by 11 countries to introduce a financial transactions tax will have far-reaching consequences. But these concerns are widely shared by other EU states and by influential lobbies in the participating countries. The proposals are anyway almost certainly unworkable in their current form. It is premature to say that the UK and its allies can't minimise the damage likely to be caused by this ill-judged tax.

The idea that EU membership somehow damages UK trade is bizarre. The obvious riposte is that it hasn't stopped German or French or even Italian companies successfully exporting to emerging markets. Eurosceptics consistently fail to spell out their alternative to EU membership, but it is hard to imagine any new UK relationship with the EU that didn't require compliance with EU regulations as the price of continued access to the single market...

Of course, it's possible that eurosceptic fears will prove well-founded. Just because they have been wrong so far on the collapse of the euro or the creation of a full eurozone fiscal and political union doesn't mean they won't be proved right eventually. Similarly, it's possible the financial transactions tax will be implemented in its current nonsensical form, the prelude to further acts of gratuitous aggression against the UK's financial-services industry.

And perhaps the EU really will reject the true "inexorable logic of the euro crisis" by rejecting open markets in favour of self-destructive protectionism. In that case, the argument for UK withdrawal could become compelling. But until then, Mr Cameron needs to start explaining why he believes EU membership is worth defending.

Full article (WSJ subscription required)



© Wall Street Journal


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment