The stocktake finds that financial
authorities vary in terms of whether – and to what degree – they
consider climate-related risks as part of their financial stability
monitoring. Around three-quarters of survey respondents consider, or are
planning to consider, climate-related risks as part of their financial
stability monitoring. Most focus on the implications of changes in asset
prices and credit quality. A minority of authorities also consider the
implications for underwriting, legal, liability and operational risks.
Authorities also consider the implications of these risks for
financial institutions. Consideration of climate-related credit and
market risks faced by banks and insurers appears more advanced than that
of other risks, or of risks faced by other types of financial
institutions. Some financial authorities have quantified – or have work
underway to quantify – climate-related risks. Such work is hindered by a
lack of consistent data on financial exposures to climate risks and
difficulties translating climate change outcomes into changes in those
exposures. No approach to quantification provides a holistic assessment
of climate-related risks to the global financial system.
In some jurisdictions, climate-related risks are being integrated
into microprudential supervision of banks and insurance firms (including
via requirements for firms’ stress testing and disclosure). However,
such work is generally at an early stage. Some authorities report having
set out – or being in the process of setting out – their expectations
as to firms’ disclosure of climate-related risks. In some cases such
expectations explicitly refer to the recommendations of the FSB’s Task
Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
The FSB will conduct further work by October 2020 to assess the
channels through which physical and transition risks could impact the
financial system and how they might interact. Particular focus will be
given to the potential amplification mechanisms and cross-border
effects, and to prioritising channels that could materialise in the
short-to-medium term. The FSB will also consider the scope for work to
assess available data through which climate-related risks can be
monitored, as well as any data gaps. This work will build upon, and be
coordinated with, that taking place in other relevant international
fora.
Notes to editors
The 18 July 2020 communique of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors notes that the FSB is continuing to examine the financial stability implications of climate change.
In April 2015 the G20 asked the FSB to consider climate risk and in December 2015 the FSB launched the industry-led Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
to develop recommendations on climate-related financial disclosures.
The Task Force published its final recommendations in June 2017. The
TCFD will publish its next status report in November.
The FSB coordinates at the international level the work of national
financial authorities and international standard-setting bodies and
develops and promotes the implementation of effective regulatory,
supervisory, and other financial sector policies in the interest of
financial stability. It brings together national authorities responsible
for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions,
international financial institutions, sector-specific international
groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank
experts. The FSB also conducts outreach with approximately 70 other
jurisdictions through its six Regional Consultative Groups.
The FSB is chaired by Randal K. Quarles, Vice Chairman, US Federal
Reserve; its Vice Chair is Klaas Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank.
The FSB Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the
Bank for International Settlements.