Have key elements already been overtaken by other proposals since the Group was launched back in February? 
      
    
    
      
	CONFIDENTIAL
	My immediate blog
	The Liikanen Group Report proposed powerful remedies to the ills of the banking system – but explicitly stopped short of a legal splitting up of banks. Instead, the Group has gone for a bank holding company structure of legally (and IT) separate companies. But the red lines between some of the entities still look quite wish-washy. Indeed, have key elements already been overtaken by other proposals since the Group was launched back in February? In particular, the Commission proposal on Bank Resolution and the BIS  consultation on a Fundamental Review of Trading Book Capital Requirements have already eaten some of the Group’s red meat. Have they turned the report into a bit of a damp squib? The Barnier reaction may be telling: “This report will feed our reflections on the need for further action”. Sounds a bit like feeding in the long grass!
	To read the full article and listen to my spoken commentary, please click on the link below.
      
      
      
      
        © Graham Bishop
     
      
	
		| Documents associated with this article | 
		| Comments on the Liikanen Report.pdf | 
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
 
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article