Whilst EuropeanIssuers welcomes the improvements of the transmission of information along the chain of intermediaries since the implementation of SRD2, there are still cases in which the transmission is blocked in the holding chain. 
      
    
    
      In its response to ESMA’s Call for Evidence on the implementation of 
the Shareholders Rights Directive 2 (SRD2), EuropeanIssuers highlighted 
several issues to the effectiveness of the SRD2 provisions on the 
identification of shareholders, transmission of information and 
facilitation of the exercise of shareholder rights, as well as on 
transparency of proxy advisors.
SRD2 sets out a common regulatory framework with regard to the 
minimum standards for the exercise of shareholder rights in EU listed 
companies. Following the implementation, EuropeanIssuers noticed the 
improvement of Shareholders identification. However, barriers to the 
identification of shareholders such as the threshold and the costs 
remain.
With regards to the definition of shareholder, harmonisation is not 
necessary. However, specifying the notion of end-investor on which the 
Directive is based would be helpful which would ensure that, no matter 
how investors hold their shares, the information will be passed down and
 up the holding chain, and would also clarify who should be regarded as 
shareholder.
Florence Bindelle, Secretary General mentioned: “To promote direct 
dialogue between issuers and end-investor, the notion of end-investor, 
which is implicit, could be specified by indicating that it relates to 
“the person having invested his own money into shares and holding them 
for his own account”.
EuropeanIssuers also advocated for the shareholder identification 
threshold to be set-up by the issuers and not the Member States.
Whilst EuropeanIssuers welcomes the improvements of the transmission 
of information along the chain of intermediaries since the 
implementation of SRD2, there are still cases in which the transmission 
is blocked in the holding chain.  SRD2 review should accordingly promote
 that the title on registered shareholders should be evidenced by 
entering the name of the end-investor in the company’s register, and 
should not be replaced, once shareholder rights have been exercised, by 
the nominee’s name.
EuropeanIssuers also included in its position the need for more 
transparency and proportionality regarding the costs and fees from the 
intermediaries, especially in the context of cross-border services.
Concerning the transmission of information, the harmonisation should 
be extended to national procedures under which shareholders communicate 
with issuers and ensuring stricter adherence to the obligation for 
intermediary to pass on the information down to the end-investor.
On proxy advisors, EuropeanIssuers highlighted the remaining issues 
regarding the errors or even misleading information appearing in the 
voting reports and for the need of having the possibility to correct 
erroneous data. Furthermore, with regards to the disclosing of general 
voting policies and methodologies, proxy advisors should better explain 
to the investors in their reports how they consider local and legal 
regulatory conditions in their voting recommendations, and how the same 
subject may lead to diverging recommendations on both sides of the 
Atlantic.
With regards to the communication with issuers, proxy advisors have 
room for improvement. Assuring better transparency from the proxy 
advisors, sufficient time to issuers to comment the draft report 
recommendations and allow issuers to comment directly on the draft 
report to guarantee the report’s objectivity.
Finally, EuropeanIssuers asks for the proxy advisors to inform their 
clients individually about any actual or potential conflicts of 
interests.
 
***
 
For EuropeanIssuers’ response to the ESMA’s Call for Evidence on the 
implementation of SRD2 provisions on proxy advisors and the investment 
chain, please click here.
European Issuers
      
      
      
      
        © EuropeanIssuers 
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article