The 
EAPB  published its response on the CEBS consultation on outsourcing claiming that CEBS and 
CESR  continue to stick to their own language which “would inevitably lead to inconsistent implementation policies.”  
EAPB  therefore suggests that both Committees should draw up a common regulatory framework in order to achieve terminological convergence. 
A general part should contain all identical provisions. This could then be complemented by a special part including specific regimes for credit institutions or investment firms.
“With regard to the corresponding list CEBS prepared on page 2 and 3 of the consultation paper, we note that the rationale behind some items on this is difficult to comprehend and would appear unjustified”, the Association states. “Particularly the reference to the different scopes of application by CEBS and CESR  remains essentially unclear.”
 Document
      
      
      
      
        © EAPB
    
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article