Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn

Article List:

 

07 April 2008

CEBS proposals for common definition on Tier1 hybrids




CEBS proposes that hybrid capital instruments should only be eligible as Tier 1 capital if they meet all of the following requirements: they must be issued and fully paid up, publicly disclosed and easily understandable. They must be permanent, able to absorb losses in liquidation and on a going concern basis and allow the cancellation of payments. In stress situations, the instrument should help prevent its insolvency and make the recapitalisation of the issuer more likely.

 

CEBS also believes that regulatory capital requirements should be met without undue reliance on hybrid instruments and puts forward two options for the limitation of Tier 1 hybrids. The objective of both options is to strengthen the quality of an institution’s regulatory capital.

 

Option 1 refers to the required Tier 1 capital and requests that Tier 1 hybrids may not at any time represent more than 30% of the required Tier 1 capital. If an institution operates above the required Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 hybrids may not at any time represent more than 50% of the total Tier 1 capital after deductions.

Option 2 sets out two limits (25%/50% of total Tier 1 capital) for the eligibility of Tier 1 hybrids relating to the quality of the individual instrument.

 

In addition, hybrids with incentives to redeem must not at any time exceed 15% of the total Tier 1 after deductions.


With regard to Tier 1 hybrids already issued that would not comply with the above requirements, CEBS proposes that they should be "grandfathered," and their eligibility to meet Tier I capital requirements should be gradually reduced to zero over a period of 30 years.

 

Press release

Advice on Hybrids

Feedback table



© CEBS - Committee of European Banking Supervisors


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment