Nevertheless, as already pointed out in previous submissions, the costs and benefits of the repair programme need to be considered in light of yet further changes that may be required to firms’ models given work on the IRB framework at the BCBS level.
The current lack of clarity on how international developments will affect the (EBA revised) IRB framework means it is extremely difficult for firms to make model investment and strategic capital planning decisions.
These issues are compounded by the ongoing review of internal models through exercises such as the ECB’s TRIM project where it is not clear how these interrelate with the repair programme. Certainty on the timing, content and consistency of the international and EU requirements is becoming increasingly critical.
AFME provides a few overarching comments on the proposed Guidelines:
-
The focus must be on eliminating unjustified RWA variance, but ensuring that risk sensitivity is maintained
-
The role of supervisors, and harmonisation in their practice, will be crucial
-
Certain portfolios may require further reflection and a more tailored approach
-
Care should be taken not to introduce unnecessary costs/burdens, for instance when it comes to LGDDs
Finally, AFME notes the present Guidelines do not address credit conversion factors and off balance sheet exposures and that it is not clear whether the Guidelines should apply to slotting approaches too. Industry would welcome clarification on these issues.
Full response
© AFME
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article